Should we continue, to support Ukraine?
IRPIN, UKRAINE - MARCH 07: Residents of Irpin flee heavy fighting via a destroyed bridge as Russian forces entered the city on March 07, 2022 in Irpin, Ukraine. Yesterday, four civilians were killed by mortar fire along the road leading from Irpin to Kyiv, which has been a key evacuation route for people fleeing Russian forces advancing from the north. Today, Ukraine rejected as "unacceptable" a Russian proposal for a humanitarian corridor that leads from Kyiv to Belarus, a Russian ally that was a staging ground for the invasion. (Photo by Chris McGrath/Getty Images)
Should we continue, to support Ukraine?
Unfortunately, I think the answer is yes, For these reasons if history teaches us anything when dictators become land-hungry they can never get enough. It’s been that way ever since the beginning of time.
The only dictator to actually conquer the known world was Alexander the Great. So there’s a precedence, and dictators like Hitler Mussolini wants to hold a new world record.
If we’re going to give Ukraine, weapons then let’s give him the weapons to win and in the war. Several things happen When a war goes on forever. Gun manufacturers and these suppliers of war equipment get rich and like the dictators, it only makes them more hungry.
If we get involved, then kernels become generals one-star generals become two star, and two star becomes three stars. Unfortunately ending the war does not serve all the power players.
A bigger problem is treaties we have treaties with probably 2530 different countries, they have treaties with another 2530 different countries. The president the United States, without the consent of Congress has two exceptions ongoing the war. In an emergency, he can go to work for 90 days, which includes the defend the US end the defend any treaties that at U.S. Congress has signed on to.
In other words no longer the Russian and Ukraine or a last the more we are risking World War three.
And that’s the way I see it. Cowboy run
